Skip to content
Name: People v. Adams
Case #: F043976
Court: CA Court of Appeal
District 5 DCA
Opinion Date: 12/16/2004
Subsequent History: 3/16/05: Revw. den.
Summary

A trial court was not required to specially instruct the jury on the meaning of the word “maliciously” in a prosecution for battery on a police dog. The Court of Appeal held that the court properly denied the defense request for a special instruction because “maliciously” as used in Penal Code section 600, subdivision (a), has no special or technical meaning. Nor did the court err in failing to give a sua sponte instruction regarding the meaning of “legal justification” under the statute, since the jury was instructed that they could not convict the defendant of battery on a police dog if they had a reasonable doubt as to the lawfulness of the arrest or the reasonableness of the force used.