Skip to content
Name: People v. Rodriguez
Case #: B142586
Court: CA Court of Appeal
District 2 DCA
Division: 3
Opinion Date: 05/31/2001
Subsequent History: Rev. granted 9/12/01 as S098821
Summary

In a prosecution for a violation of Penal Code section 288.5, continuing sexual abuse of a child, the trial court did not err by failing to sua sponte define the phrase “recurring access.” The phrase “recurring access” does not have a technical meaning, and thus its meaning is that used commonly. Since Rodriguez did not request amplification of the phrase, the trial court did not err by failing to further define it.