Skip to content
Name: U.S. v. Holmes
Court: US Court of Appeals
District 9 Cir
Opinion Date: 10/10/2000
Subsequent History: None
Summary

The trial court did not err in permitting the informant to say that, in her opinion, the defendant was the person in the photographs taken by the camera in the bank. The informant had testified to meeting the defendant six times. Her testimony was helpful to the finder of fact.