In this case, the juvenile court did not include a visitation order following its selection of the permanent plan of legal guardianship for the children. The Court of Appeal agreed with the parties that the court’s Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 orders must be reversed as to visitation and remanded for the purpose of specifying the frequency and duration of visits between father and the children, pursuant to section 366.26, subdivision (c)(4)(C) and rule 5.735(c)(2), following the establishment of legal guardianship.