At appellant’s sentencing hearing following his burglary conviction, the trial court granted the prosecution’s request to impose a criminal protective order under Penal Code section 136.2, subdivision (i). The Court of Appeal held the order must be stricken as an unauthorized sentence because burglary is not one of the enumerated offenses in that statute. The court rejected respondent’s request to remand the matter to allow the trial court to consider using its inherent authority to issue a nonstatutory protective order, as the record contained no facts that would support such an order.