Skip to content
Name: In re Miguel J.
Case #: B339932
Court: CA Court of Appeal
District 2 DCA
Division: 8
Opinion Date: 08/03/2026

Domestic violence, when committed in the presence of the minor, is a sufficient basis for jurisdiction pursuant to section 300, subdivision (a). Minor was removed from Father and released to Mother following a domestic violence incident where Father accidentally struck Minor while Mother was holding him in her arms. Father appealed and the reviewing court affirmed. Section 300, subdivision (a) requires that a parent’s harmful act be “nonaccidental.” Here, Father intentionally struck at Mother, but accidentally hit Minor. The intentional act of domestic violence, in the presence of Minor, is sufficient for jurisdiction pursuant to section 300, subdivision (a).
Justice…

View Full Summary
Name: In re A.T.
Case #: E086411
Court: CA Court of Appeal
District 4 DCA
Division: 2
Opinion Date: 06/05/2026

Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (e) is applicable only where a child is under the age of five at the time of the jurisdiction hearing. Minor was detained from Guardian based on physical abuse and mistreatment that occurred when he was four years old. A petition was filed which included an allegation under section 300(e) which pertains to abuse of children under five years old. By the time of the jurisdiction hearing, Minor had turned five. The juvenile court found true the section 300, subdivision (e) allegations, among other allegations. Guardian appealed and the reviewing court reversed. For…

View Full Summary
Name: In re O.M.
Case #: A173461
Court: CA Court of Appeal
District 1 DCA
Division: 2
Opinion Date: 05/07/2026

Juvenile court erred in dismissing jurisdiction where the evidence compelled a finding, as a matter of law, that Minors were at risk for malnutrition. A petition was filed for O.M. and his younger sibling after O.M. was hospitalized for a broken femur. At the hospital, O.M was also treated for malnutrition as his weight was less than 1% on the growth charts. Mother testified at the jurisdiction hearing that the family followed a vegan diet but she understood that she needed to feed O.M more calories. Mother also expressed that O.M. was a picky eater and that she still didn’t…

View Full Summary
Name: In re R.L.
Case #: B341295
Court: CA Court of Appeal
District 2 DCA
Division: 8
Opinion Date: 10/14/2025

Juvenile court did not err in dismissing petition where a single lapse of parents’ judgment did not compel a finding of risk of harm to Minor. The 10-month old minor was detained from Father and released to Mother after a car accident where Father was driving while Mother and Minor were in the back seat and Minor was in mother’s lap and not a car seat. Both parents were under the influence of alcohol. Both Mother and Minor suffered injuries as a result of the accident, but Minor was not severely injured. At the jurisdiction hearing, the juvenile court dismissed…

View Full Summary
Name: In re Miguel J.
Case #: B339932
Court: CA Court of Appeal
District 2 DCA
Division: 8
Opinion Date: 09/22/2025

There was sufficient evidence to support section 300, subdivision (a) allegations where Father struck Mother while she was holding Minor. Minor was detained from Father and released to Mother after police were called to a domestic violence incident. Father struck Mother while she was holding four-month old Minor and accidentally struck Minor. Mother stayed at a shelter for a week with Minor but then returned to the family home. The juvenile court sustained domestic violence counts under Section 300, subdivisions (a) and (b). Family Maintenance services were ordered for Mother and enhancement services for Father. Father appealed and the reviewing…

View Full Summary
Name: In re A.M.
Case #: B343879
Court: CA Court of Appeal
District 2 DCA
Division: 8
Opinion Date: 09/18/2025

Juvenile court erred in removing Minor from incarcerated Father who had made a suitable plan for Minor’s care. Father had been granted sole physical and joint legal custody of Minor. When Father became incarcerated, he arranged for his sister to care for Minor. When Mother learned of Father’s incarceration, she refused to return Minor to paternal aunt and then neglected Minor, leading to the present dependency case. The juvenile court sustained jurisdictional allegations against Father based on his criminal history and removed Minor from both parents. Minor appealed and the reviewing court reversed. Section 361(d) is applicable here because Minor…

View Full Summary
Name: In re X.D.
Case #: B338140
Court: CA Court of Appeal
District 2 DCA
Division: 5
Opinion Date: 09/10/2025

Section 300, subdivision (g) jurisdiction is proper where an incarcerated parent suggests only unsuitable caregivers for their child. Minor was detained after Mother was killed and Father’s whereabouts were unknown. Minor had not had contact with Father in over three years. Father was located in prison and expressed a desire to reunify with Minor. Father recommended his mother or brother as potential placements for Minor. The Agency determined paternal grandmother was an unsuitable placement and paternal uncle never responded to any Agency phone calls. The juvenile court found true the section 300, subdivision (g) jurisdictional allegation and Father appealed. The…

View Full Summary
Name: In re Hunter V.
Case #: B339028
Court: CA Court of Appeal
District 2 DCA
Division: 7
Opinion Date: 07/03/2025

Juvenile court erred in denying continuance request so that incarcerated parent could be present or sign a waiver of personal presence. Minors were detained due to Mother’s substance abuse. Father was incarcerated on murder charges. Minors were placed with relatives. Prior to the jurisdiction hearing, Father provided Agency with paternal grandmother, paternal great grandmother, and his ex-wife as potential placements for Minors. Father was not transported to the jurisdiction hearing. The Agency requested a continuance of the jurisdiction hearing because Father had not waived his appearance or counsel. The court denied the request and held the hearing in his absence,…

View Full Summary
Name: In re E.G.
Case #: B338002
Court: CA Court of Appeal
District 2 DCA
Division: 8
Opinion Date: 06/10/2025

Substantial evidence supported the section 300, subdivision (d) finding, despite recantation by Minor. The Agency became involved with the family after 11-year-old Minor reported sexual abuse by her stepfather beginning when she was six years old. Minor and two younger half-siblings were removed from stepfather and remained in the home with Mother. Mother and extended family did not believe stepfather had abused Minor. After a conversation with an aunt, where the aunt suggested Minor may have dreamed the abuse occurred, Minor recanted. Nevertheless, the juvenile court found jurisdiction pursuant to subdivision (d). Stepfather appealed and the reviewing court affirmed. On…

View Full Summary
Name: In re Jayden A.
Case #: E084114
Court: CA Court of Appeal
District 4 DCA
Division: 2
Opinion Date: 06/13/2025

There was insufficient evidence to support the jurisdiction findings as to Father. Minor was detained following a domestic violence incident between Mother and Mother’s boyfriend. Father had ADHD which he was treating through individual counseling. Paternal grandmother reported that Father could become overwhelmed by parenting and would leave Jayden in her care while he took the time and space he needed. Father tested positive for marijuana on three occasions and reported he had been a victim of Mother’s domestic violence previously, when they were in a relationship. At the combined jurisdiction and disposition hearing, the juvenile court found true jurisdictional…

View Full Summary