Mental health diversion statute (PC 1001.36) does not authorize trial courts to find satisfactory performance unless the defendant substantially performs the diversion requirements. PC 1001.36 allows a trial court to dismiss the charges if a defendant has performed satisfactorily in diversion, i.e., if defendant has (1) substantially complied with diversion; (2) avoided significant new law violations; and (3) has a plan for long-term mental health care. Here, even though the trial court found defendant made “amazing progress” in the past year after she was remanded into custody, the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the charges where defendant committed…
Mental health diversion statute (PC 1001.36) does not authorize trial courts to find satisfactory performance unless the defendant substantially performs the diversion requirements. PC 1001.36 allows a trial court to dismiss the charges if a defendant has performed satisfactorily in diversion, i.e., if defendant has (1) substantially complied with diversion; (2) avoided significant new law violations; and (3) has a plan for long-term mental health care. Here, even though the trial court found defendant made “amazing progress” in the past year after she was remanded into custody, the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the charges where defendant committed numerous new crimes while on diversion.
The full opinion is available on the court’s website here: https://www4.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/H052071.PDF
