The Court of Appeal agreed with appellant’s argument that there was insufficient evidence to support appellant’s conviction for unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, as there was insufficient evidence that the complaining witness was under 18 years of age. As such, the court reversed appellant’s conviction for sexual intercourse with a minor.
Name: Evidence
Case #: C094718
Opinion Date: 01/20/2023
Attorney: Theresa Osterman Stevenson
Summary