The Court of Appeal agreed with appellant that the trial court prejudicially erred when it imposed consecutive life sentences (15 years to life) on counts 1 and 2 pursuant to Penal Code section 667.6, subdivision (d), because “[t]he finding that the offenses occurred on ‘separate occasions’ is not supported by substantial evidence, for there was no evidence of any interval between the two offenses to show a reasonable opportunity to reflect.”
